[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Wakeup from a PCI device
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: Wakeup from a PCI device
- From: klaus@efficient.com (Klaus Fosmark)
- Date: Thu, 15 Aug 96 12:44:14 CDT
- Resent-Date: Thu, 15 Aug 96 12:44:14 CDT
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <"CuKVl2.0.ok6.6Es4o"@dart>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
Bruce,
> Many of you may recall a thread back in April talking about how a PCI
> device could initiate a wakeup for a powered down system. The proposal
> that I had made as a part of the initial work I did on PCI Power
> Management defined the standard INTx# signals as the mechanism to
> accomplish this. After much discussion and working through as many of
> the technical issues as we could, the PCI Power Management Working
> Group has decided to request that a reserved pin be assigned for this
> purpose. While the technical details are quite involved, the overall
> reason is that we decided that we did not want to eliminate the
> possibility of a device in a powered-down slot initiating a wakeup and
> the only electrically feasible way to do this while maintaining
> compatibility with older PCI cards is to use a new pin.
Could you please elaborate on the reason why INTx# would not work?
/Klaus
9 „ q