[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PCI Target Addressing and AD[1:0]
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: PCI Target Addressing and AD[1:0]
- From: Devendra K Tripathi <tripathi@Synopsys.COM>
- Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 09:25:11 -0700
- Cc: pci-sig@znyx.com
- Resent-Date: Thu, 19 Sep 1996 09:25:11 -0700
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <"chUYQ.0.Lj2.sHNGo"@dart>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
Yes, that is right.
Tripathi.
> From pci-sig-request@znyx.com Wed Sep 18 21:05:05 1996
> Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> Resent-Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 13:27:32 -0700
> Date: Wed, 18 Sep 1996 13:27:32 -0700
> Subject: PCI Target Addressing and AD[1:0]
> X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> Resent-Message-Id: <"U8_WS2.0.Zw.Fp7Go"@dart>
> X-Mailing-List: <pci-sig@znyx.com> archive/latest/3692
> X-Loop: pci-sig@znyx.com
> Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
> Content-Length: 252
>
>
> We have a PCI adapter which does both master and target functions.
>
> The PCI spec has seems to be confusing on the issue of decoding AD[1:0] on target accesses.
>
> If our device claims four bytes, I assume we do not have to decode AD[1:0].
>
> Comments?
>
Ô Á