[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VGA Palette snoopining
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: VGA Palette snoopining
- From: Devendra K Tripathi <tripathi@Synopsys.COM>
- Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 17:58:36 -0700
- Cc: pci-sig@znyx.com
- Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 17:58:36 -0700
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <"0vap32.0.LD7._tpGo"@dart>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
Nothing ! It is like saying what happens if Frame buffer data is not ready in time.
Tripathi.
> From pci-sig-request@znyx.com Fri Sep 20 17:52:12 1996
> Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> Resent-Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 15:32:08 -0700
> Date: Fri, 20 Sep 1996 15:32:08 -0700
> From: mo@rendition.com (Mohammed Sriti)
> Subject: VGA Palette snoopining
> X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
> Resent-Message-Id: <"NGKe12.0.Pv6.4lnGo"@dart>
> X-Mailing-List: <pci-sig@znyx.com> archive/latest/3701
> X-Loop: pci-sig@znyx.com
> Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
> Content-Length: 399
>
>
>
> The PCI 2.1 spec states in page 115
>
> "When a device has been programmmed to snoop the access, it cannot insert
> wait states or delay the access in any way and, therefore, must be able to
> latch and process the data without delay."
>
> The question is: What can such a device do if its internal buffers are all
> full, and therefore is unable to latch the snooped data.
>
> Any response is appreciated.
>
> MS
>
>
!