[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Linear address mapping
- To: "'John R Pierce'" <pierce@scruznet.com>
- Subject: RE: Linear address mapping
- From: "Kevin D. Davis" <kevind@ti.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 16:49:54 -0500
- Encoding: 50 TEXT
Actually it work fine for me. I got an HTML attachment that I could double
click and view. The only problem was that I got a text version.
Of course, if you're using MS Messaging, we are using the same email.
Thanks,
Kevin
----------
From: John R Pierce[SMTP:pierce@scruznet.com]
Sent: Friday, September 27, 1996 1:47 PM
To: Mailing List Recipients
Cc: pci-sig@znyx.com
Subject: Re: Linear address mapping
> ...
>
>
> > (please excuse the fact that I am using MIME/HTML. It was the only way
I
> > could send the VDS info near the bottom of this message...)
>
> JOKE?
>
> Did you see the bottom of your message itself? A sea of
> "/font"s...
Ouch. Well, if I had sent that VDS stuff as plain text, it would have been
wordwrapped to a total mess and lost all formatting. At least to my email
(and
I think netscape) it arrived with all formatting intact. I normally use
straight 75 column ascii text for mailling lists as I know a lot of people
are
using older email that doesn't support html formatting.
Double ouch. I just looked at the RAW message I'd sent, I didn't realize
it
formatted that badly! Frankly, I was cutting and pasting blocks of RTF.. I
also didn't realize that my new emailler would send the whole body twice,
once
as quoted-printable, and the second time as HTML. phhhh! Well, now I know
why
I leave the MIME/HTML stuff disabled!
Apologies to the group for that mess(age).
-jrp
B Ô Á