[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Interrupts - electrical question
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: Interrupts - electrical question
- From: PETE_HAWKINS@ziatech.com
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:30:30 -0800
- Resent-Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:30:30 -0800
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <"YxRAp2.0.7N.WXvxo"@dart>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
We are developing a PCI carrier board (not for Windows) with 4 slots.
It is advantageous for us to segregate interrupts on a per slot basis
(even in the case of multi-function cards).
Is there any reason, why I couldn't tie all four interrupts (INTA#, INTB#,
INTC#, INTD#) from a given PCI slot together to form a single interrupt.
Thus, I would have four interrupts, one from each slot.
holeman
_________________________________________________________________________
Jim Holeman Tandem Computers, Inc.
(512) 432-8755 (fax 8247) 14231 Tandem Boulevard
holeman@austx.tandem.com Austin, Tx 78728-6699
"A gentle answer turns away wrath"
<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<
This is OK on a motherboard, because the BIOS will know that you did
this and assign interrupts correctly. This routing will cause
problems if it is done on a plug-in extender sort of device (requiring
a P2P bridge) becuase the BIOS won't know the specifics of your device
and will assume the standard interrupt routing as defined in the P2P
bridge spec.
Pete Hawkins
pete_hawkins@ziatech.com
T