[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 960RP in adapter cards -Reply -Reply
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: 960RP in adapter cards -Reply -Reply
- From: Irv Negrin <IDN@nms.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 17:00:45 -0500
- Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Feb 1997 17:00:45 -0500
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-Id: <"Dxmg31.0.OP1.kat2p"@dart>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
Henry Lau writes:
>
The way I look at it is that a i960JA+PLX9060 is $80 while the 960RP is
$60
at low quantities. So it is a significant cost savings as well as real
estate savings. I was thinking about using the 960RP with just the
primary
PCI and ignore the secondary PCI.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Henry Lau | Phone: 619-674-5000 ext 222
Director of Software Development | Fax: 619-674-5005
Patriot Scientific Corporation | Email: hlau@ptsc.com
10989 Via Frontera, San Diego, CA 92127 | WWW:
http://www.ptsc.com
I agree with the cost a real estate savings but how do you get around
the clock frequency PCI non-compliance for add-in cards as stated on
page 133 of the PCI Specification Revision 2.1?
Irv Negrin
¤