[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: target termination
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: target termination
- From: Joe Cowan <jpc@hpmckee.fc.hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 98 10:58:12 MDT
- In-Reply-To: <35507AA9.DE0D79D5@vcubed.com>; from "Michael Tresidder" at May 06, 98 10:58 am
- Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85]
- Resent-Date: Sat, 9 May 1998 04:42:58 -0700
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"z9YMD.0.fQ.0cpKr"@electra.znyx.com>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
Responding to Michael Tresidder:
If I understand your proposal correctly, you would like to be able to
save the normally wasted cycle required by FRAME deassertion protocol
when a target disconnects. This would be accomplished by the target
asserting STOP on the next-to-the-last data phase instead of doing so on
the last data phase.
While this might be considered for future I/O bus protocols, I think
it's highly risky for PCI, and would provide almost no benefit for most
applications. Saving one cycle per transaction when a target
disconnects doesn't seem very significant, particularly when such
transactions usually transfer a cacheline or more of data. If the
approach could be applied to the case of target retries, the benefit
might be a little higher for environments with PCI-to-PCI bridges.
However, I don't think that's possible.
Joe Cowan
*----------------------------------------------------------------------*
| Joe Cowan |
| ESG System Design and Performance |
| Email: jpc@fc.hp.com Hewlett-Packard Company |
| Work: (+1) 970 898-2404 | (T)898-2404 3404 East Harmony Road; MS F2 |
| Fax: (+1) 970 898-3197 | (T)898-3197 Fort Collins, CO 80528 USA |
*----------------------------------------------------------------------*