[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: PCI card on other side of bridge
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: RE: PCI card on other side of bridge
- From: "Schneider, Dave" <David.Schneider@emulex.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 10:07:00 -0700
- Delivered-To: pcisig@teleport.com
- Priority: urgent
- Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 05:00:10 -0700
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"j0kem3.0.kt3.ze_zr"@electra.znyx.com>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
> From: jbaker
>> From: "Schneider, Dave" <David.Schneider@emulex.com>
>> This was fixed in the Rev 1A, back in mid-96 as I recall. NT didn't
like
>> it. We moved to the 9080 only this year, and for other reasons.
> Your reference is unclear. Are you saying that NT still didn't like
> the Rev1A 9060SD, or just that it didn't like the earlier revision
> (as I would certainly expect).
Sorry. I did mean that NT did not like the *earlier* version (Rev 1),
and is happy with the fix.
> We have a product that uses the Rev1A 9060SD and it behaves under NT
> quite well.
We also have been happy with the Rev 1A. We switched to the 9080 because
we had also been using a 9060 Rev3 (on a related product). Using the
9080 allowed us to put the same part on both products, and gave us hooks
for I2o and other improvements.
Dave Schneider
Emulex Corp.
/dps