[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: pci extensions (was: *New* PCI bus standard?)
- To: Mailing List Recipients <pci-sig-request@znyx.com>
- Subject: Re: pci extensions (was: *New* PCI bus standard?)
- From: Alan Deikman <Alan.Deikman@znyx.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Sep 1998 17:54:18 -0700
- Delivered-To: pcisig@teleport.com
- Resent-Date: Fri, 11 Sep 1998 11:02:32 -0700
- Resent-From: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
- Resent-Message-ID: <"AMdz-.0.UB7.rN7-r"@electra.znyx.com>
- Resent-Sender: pci-sig-request@znyx.com
>From: Darrel Peterson <DPeterson@mapletreenetworks.com>
>I am looking for information about the latest extensions being proposed.
>Specifically, the extensions to double the speed of the bus to 133 MHZ.
>I seen an article that stated HP, Compaq, and IBM were working on an
>extension. I would appreciate it if you could point me in the right
>direction.
Last weekend I posted a letter about a mention of this from
the SJ Mercury News, asking if anyone had more information.
The September 7 issue of EE Times has this same teaser on
the front page. The only information it added was the notion
of a 133MHz bus, and that Intel was contemplating a "competing"
I/O technology, a gigabit serial bus.
The silence on this list on this subject has been deafening.
I can only conclude that either nobody here knows about it
or those that do know about it have been instructed not to
squeal.
Well, I know there are plenty of readers here who could
knowledgeably comment on the following questions:
1. How feasible is 133MHz bus clocking/signalling
really with the current art of silicon? Could
you really pump it through a connector or would
this be an on-board-only technology?
2. How would a gigabit serial bus compete with
64-bit, 33MHz PCI? Convenience? Cost?
USB and Firewire sure have been slow to take
off.
I'd be interested in any comments. 'Till then, see
you at the FCC test sight. ;)
Regards,
-----------------------
Alan.Deikman@znyx.com